PretentiousSports.com

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

FOXYMORON: Fox WS Baseball Game Coverage doesn't Include much "Game" or "Coverage"

written by Buddy Lung, jr.

Fox obviously doesn't think that the fact that we are watching THE WORLD SERIES of Baseball is exciting enough on its own merits and so feels the need to do whatever it can to distract us from watching the games. Here's some notes I've taken on the coverage so far.

SCOOT ON OUTTA HERE: Fox has concocted the genius idea of making a cartoon baseball named Scooter who tells you about pitches. That's right, folks, for those of you who didn't know a fastball goes fast and a curveball curves, your questions are finally answered. Just mention the cartoon at the water cooler to spark up anger and frustration in even your most passive co-workers. Phil "The Scooter" Rizzuto is turning over in his grave... What's that you say? He's still alive? Then he's turning over in his bed.

RAISING THE BAR: Hi, people at Fox. I have a question for you: can you get rid of (or at least shrink down), that score bar across the top of the screen? If you haven't noticed, it is across the ENTIRE screen. Couldn't you just put it in a corner or something like every other station would? I mean do you really need the entire length of the screen? And another thing: do you really need a flame graphic every time someone throws a strike, makes an out, or scores a run? If I wanted budget sound effects and embarrassing graphics, I could always break out my old Atari system.

PASSING THE BUCK: Joe Buck was announcing the football game on Fox at 1, and now here he is announcing the baseball game at 8. So which one is he an expert at? Could be both, but I doubt it... If he's not an expert at either one, then why hire him for them? John Madden calls football, but doesn't call the World Series. It's one or the other. So, what's Joe Buck doing here?

FOX: FAIR AND BALANCED COVERAGE: Joe Buck's father announced for the Cardinals who are in the Series. Tim McCarver was fired by the New York Yankees and the New York-hating Red Sox are in the World Series (though in fairness, he's a former Cardinal... though I'm sure he has grudges there too). Good choices for a nice national neutral broadcast (note: sarcasm). But then again, it seems to me that everyone in the country is cheering on the Red Sox at this point, so I guess it doesn't really make a difference.

THE S#$% HITS THE FAN: Thanks to Fox, we are able to see that (SURPRISE!) there are actually fans in the stadium. Fox cameras spend more time pointed in the stands than at the game. At the first two games in Fenway, all they did was show Boston fans and Boston fan celebrities in the crowd, several of whom they actually wasted my time interviewing. Then at Game 3 at Busch, all they showed was... Boston fans and Boston celebrity fans in the crowd, some of who they wasted my time interviewing.

Aside from it being onesided, it's still distracting. That's great, Stephen King is in the crowd... wowee... and he's praying. Great. But we don't have to see it more than we see the actual game.

SPEAKING OF FAN CELEBRITIES: I don't care what Ben Affleck, hockey players, writers, actors, politicians, or anyone else in the audience think about the Red Sox this year. Especially Tom Hanks, who has NEVER been a Red Sox fan until this World Series. As if it's not bad enough to listen to Buck and McCarver, now I need to hear what Tom Hanks has to say about Boston. Sorry, Tom: you're a great actor, but you're also a pawn. Is it a coincidence that the whole interview lead up to a commercial for the new Tom Hanks movie "Polar Express?" Let's face it, this is Fox there are no accidents unless they are coming from McCarver about player's names.

KNOW YOUR SUBJECT: Tim McCarver hasn't watched a game since last postseason. Hey Tim, In case you're wondering: it's TIM Wakefield, not Bill Wakefield. And it's BRONSON Arroyo, not Brandon Arroyo. Tim has offered some fantastic insight for the viewers of the game. Like when Pedro Martinez struck out Womack on a changeup. Cue: extra slow motion replay with awkward silence from the booth who doesn't know how to give an analysis of what is being shown on the screen. After about ten seconds, McCarver chimes in: "...and the changeup... gets Wallmack." A) Thanks for the insight, Bill... I mean Tim. B) It's Womack. Wo-Mack. Not Wallmack. Wo. As in "Whoa settle down and increase the thickness in your frames, cause you ain't reading the roster sheet right!

Poor Joel Buck, I mean Joe Buck... He keeps quiet, not correcting his partner, and trying not to embarrass McCarver anymore than McCarver embarrasses himself. Or maybe Buck doesn't know the players names either? Man, if I wanted to listen to two people discuss topics they know nothing about and have to be coached on before each broadcast, I'd watch the Presidential debates.

ENOUGH COMMERCIALS: At last year's ALCS game 7, Tim Wakefield came to the mound, threw a few windup pitches. A nervous-looking late inning replacement Aaron Boone approached the batter's box. Wakefield nodded, set, and wound up. What tension! Boone readied and when Wakefield delivered, Boone jumped all over the pitch like it was in slow motion. Of course, the viewers at home were watching a Ford commercial and only got to see the swing already in progress and the aftermath of the game-winning homerun. Fox, squeezing every lasts econd out of their commercials, nearly entirely missed the defining moment of the series, and probably the entire 2003 baseball season. You thought they would have learned their lesson after last year. Judging by all the off screen first pitches: They didn't learn anything.

ENOUGH SELF PROMOTING: As if it's not bad enough there are signs behind the plate advertising Fox's broadcast schedule. As if it's not bad enough that the voice overs are constantly reminding us we're watching Fox Sports. And as if we don't get enough shots of the audience as it is! We have to contend with these camera hungry freaks with the "I'M ON FOX TV" signs in the audience. It wasn't cool the first time someone tried to get on TV with those signs. It sure isn't cool fifteen years later.

DUE UP: Right before commercial, they show who is due up. But they only show one player. There are three full batters due up. Also, can we do something about the soundtrack. For example, after The Yankees in the ALCS won 2 games, they played "Living on a Prayer" with the line "We're halfway there." This is just one example of the wow-very-clever song choices playing while they show clips with the Fox logo in the corner. Hey, Fox, I have the perfect song for Game 4: It's called "You're so Vain."

ENOUGH COMMERCIALS PART 2: I don't know the shows HOUSE MD, The Rebel Billionaire, or the Fake Obnoxious Boss Billionaire, but I've seen the same commercial so many times, I hate them already.

ADVICE TO MCCARVER: I know it's 100% humidity during the game, since you spent about ten minutes in the Game 3 first third talking about the weather in St. Louis. But when Edmonds runs down a Red Sox line drive and makes a great play running, you say "great play by Edmonds." You don't say "The humidity must have slowed down that ball in the air because it looked like it was falling in." Because it's just weird. And it doesn't make any scientific sense either. I could hear all of St. Louis telling him to shut up when he made that call. All this pretending to be objective belongs on Fox News Net, not on Fox network.

CANDID CAMERA: Thanks to these super hidden, planted in the dirt on the field cameras, we get a magnified view of the dirt around homeplate! Oh yeah, and in the background you could see the batter and catcher too. As if it matters. Dirt cam = Exciting! Groundbreaking! (No pun intended!) The worthlessness of these multi-angles was highlighted in Game 2 on a questionable at-the-knees strike to Manny Ramirez. Fox showed us several different angles slo-mo replays. Each time, McCarver and Buck, turned into deer in headlights. "As you can see in this angle... well ahhhh... yeah that is close," they would say to each angle that they realized showed nothing, absolutely nothing about the location of the pitch. Then they panicked and said "let's see it from another angle." Out of clever shots, they went to the overhead view, which in case you didn't know is there for pitch location outside and inside from the plate, and does nothing at all for location of the pitch high or low.

THE BLIMP: Get rid of the damn blimp. For the first games of the playoffs I thought my TV was broken. Then I realized it was an obnoxious blimp circling the stadium. Get rid of it! Believe me, we won't use "the blimp camera" for any good shots anyway.

ADVICE TO MCCARVER PART 2: Let me just clarify this from me and everyone else in the world watching the game (Red Sox fans included). Suppan's baserunning blunder in Game 3 was a Bill Buckner-esque mistake. It was NOT, repeat NOT a "heck of a throw" by David Ortiz.
In conclusion, I just want to say one thing: Bob Costas, I'm sorry I talked badly about you. Come back and let's make up!

Tuesday, October 26, 2004

JOBU NEEDS A REFILL: 10/26/2004

the week in sports from the weak in sports

written by Buddy Lung

BOSTON WINS! - They beat the Yankees in the ALCS in the greatest comeback in baseball history. Because the 86 years of the rivalry buildup wasn't enough drama for their fans.

NEW YORK LOSES! - Give them credit. Even when it comes to choking, the New York Yankees pulled off the "best" choke in baseball history.

CARDINALS BEAT HOUSTON - Now all they have to do is contend with the red hot Red Sox... and all of their drooling supporters on Fox TV.

WIZARDS AND BULLS BRAWL IN EXHIBITION GAME - It all started when the Wizards' Larry Hughes pushed Bulls' Kirk Hinrich. Then it got really out of hand when Don Zimmer ran onto the court...

UNDEFEATED PATS BEAT JETS - If only some of this New England momentum would rub off on the John Kerry "team."

GARY SHEFFIELD SAYS BARRY BONDS GAVE HIM CREAM WHICH TURNED OUT TO BE STEROIDS - Ah, yes. The familiar blame it on your friend routine. Mrs. Sheffield: "Who's steroids are these Gary?" Lil' Gary: "Barry Bonds', Mom... I swear they are Barry Bonds." Come on, Gary, I used that in high school all the time.

RICKY WILLIAMS WANTS TO UN-RETIRE - The funny part is no one is even asking "what's wrong with that guy?" because we already know the answer. Especially me, I just smoked an ounce of Jamaican red bud with him.

RICKY WILLIAMS WANTS TO UN-RETIRE PART 2 - He actually wants to return to college ball, not NFL. Why? He said he "Misses packing the Bowls." Get it... Woo hoo! Fun times. Hello? Anyone? Anyone?

GATORS FIRE COACH ZOOK - This is a tragedy for me as a fan. Just because I like saying "Zook" a lot.

BENGALS WIN ON MFL FOR FIRST TIME IN 12 YEARS - They actually won!?!?! With this and Boston up 2-0 in the World Series, the apocalypse may be near. Wait a minute everyone... funny how Pete Rose has been laying low through all of this, isn't it?

YOU HEARD IT HERE FIRST... AGAIN!

Looks like ESPN.com again is following the trends set by us here at Pretentious Sports.

Remember Khalid Washington talking about a Boston/NY style rivalry needed in other sports? Well, let's just say ESPN is on the same wavelength.

See their article here (http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=1908700) or read Khalid's "If You Like Watching Grass Grow" in our Archives.

NFL WEEK 7 "COMPETITIVE PICKS" RESULTS

At the start of it, they were neck-to-neck. Matthew Lungariello lead Khalid Washington 9-8. Each correct pick gets a point. So let's begin... Gentlemen, start your engines:

M: Matthew Lungariello
K: Khalid Washington

(in case you couldn't figure out the abbrevs... that is, abbreviations)

Denver Broncos vs Cincinnati Bengals --- Bengals
result: both picked Broncos; Score: M9 K8

Jacksonville Jaguars vs Indianapolis Colts --- Jaguars
result: both picked Colts; Score: M9 K8

San Diego Chargers vs Carolina Panthers --- Chargers
result: both picked Panthers; Score: M9 K8

Philadelphia Eagles vs Cleveland Browns --- Eagles
result: both picked Eagles; Score: M10 K9

Chicago Bears vs Tampa Bay Buccaneers --- Buccaneers
result: both picked Bucs; Score: M11 K10

Tennessee Titans vs Minnesota Vikings --- Vikings
result: both picked Vikes; Score: M12 K11

Atlanta Falcons vs Kansas City Chiefs --- Chiefs
result: M: Falcs, K: Chiefs; Score: M12 K12

Buffalo Bills vs Baltimore Ravens --- Ravens
result: both picked Ravens; Score: M13 K13

Detroit Lions vs New York Giants --- Lions
result: both picked Giants; Score: M13 K13

Saint Louis Rams vs Miami Dolphins --- Dolphins
result: both picked Rams; Score: M13 K13

New Orleans Saints vs Oakland Raiders --- Saints
result: M: Raiders K: Saints; Score: M13 K14

Dallas Cowboys vs Green Bay Packers --- Packers
result: both picked Cowboys; Score: M13 K14

Seattle Seahawks vs Arizona Cardinals --- Cardinals
result: both picked Seahawks; Score: M13 K14

New York Jets vs New England Patriots --- Patriots
result: both picked Pats; Score: M14 K15

Final results: Khalid leads Matt 15-14. Stay tuned for Week 8. When this editor predicts both Matthew and Khalid will make safe picks and end up neck and neck AGAIN! See you then...

Friday, October 22, 2004

THE PRETENTIOUS SPORTS WEEK 7 FOOTBALL PICKS

Ladies and gentleman... our comeptitve football picks continue. So far, the score (one point per correct pick) is neck-to-neck with Matt leading Khalid 9-8. This will only be the second week of picks out of the seventh week of NFL. We promise they'll be more regular like Metamucil style. -ed.

MATTHEW LUNGARIELLO'S PICKS (score so far: 9)
NE PAts vs NY Jets -- Patriots
NY Giant vs Det. Lions --- Giants
Balt. Ravens vs Buffalo Bills -- Ravens
Phily Eagles vs Cleve. Browns -- Eagles
Indy Colts vs Jac Jaguars -- Colts
Tenn Titans vs Minn Vikings -- Vikings
SD Chargers vs Carolin Panthers -- Panthers
Miami Dolphins vs StL Rams -- Rams
TB Bucs vs Chicago Bears -- Bucs
KC Chiefs vs Atlanta Falcons -- Falcons
GB Packers vs. Dallas Cowboys -- Cowboys
Seattle Seahawks vs Arizona Cards -- Seahawks
Oakland Raiders vs NO Saints -- Raiders
Cinncinati Bengals vs Broncos -- Broncos

KHALID WASHINGTON'S PICKS (score so far: 8)
NE PAts vs NY Jets -- PATS
NY Giant vs Det. Lions --- GIANTS
Balt. Ravens vs Buffalo Bills -- RAVENS
Phily Eagles vs Cleve. Browns -- EAGLES
Indy Colts vs Jac Jaguars -- COLTS
Tenn Titans vs Minn Vikings -- VIKINGS
SD Chargers vs Carolin Panthers -- PANTHERS
Miami Dolphins vs StL Rams -- RAMS
TB Bucs vs Chicago Bears -- BUCS
KC Chiefs vs Atlanta Falcons -- CHIEFS
GB Packers vs. Dallas Cowboys -- COWBOYS
Seattle Seahawks vs Arizona Cards -- SEAHAWKS
Oakland Raiders vs NO Saints -- SAINTS
Cinncinati Bengals vs Broncos -- BRONCOS

Thursday, October 21, 2004

THE DATING GAME: Khalid Finds Himself in a "Pajama Jam" Over A Girl

written by Khalid Washington

I've been watching the ALCS, and after a long cry and a few therapy sessions, I'm back with another installment of the Pretentious Dating Game. This week's episode stems from a long time crush that I've had. 5 foot 5 inches tall, brown skinned, brown hair, very curvy, beautiful eyes too. Crush has a Bachelors degree and the whole nine yards. Sounds perfect to you? Of course she does; I'm dating her. But since I'm dating her, we know there has to be something that doesn't quite make her a dream girl. There has to be one thing (at least) wrong with her. A thing that make you go hmmm as C + C Music Factory might say.

You guessed it: Crush has a boyfriend.

He's not been in the picture for some time now and she seems convinced that there relationship is done. I'm not as convinced as her. They've been on and off for about six years now (SIX!) and I'm not sure anybody wants to let that much invested time slip away.

She constantly tries to make hints that she wants something more out of our "friendship." She has bought gifts for me. To these, I have simply replied, "That was sweet. Thanks." She has regularly called me on the phone to hang out or have a "pajama party" so to speak, to which I have mostly relied, "I'm too tired to have a party tonight. Maybe some other time." Notice I said mostly, because unfortunately even when you're tired, there are times when other parts of your anatomy are wide awake and looking for "ahem", something to occupy their time. Her constant desire for closeness has almost gotten uncomfortable. I know of her boyfriend. I'm not good friends with him... not really friends at all actually, just acquaintances. But nonetheless...it is what it is.

Crush and her boyfriend could work things out any day now. And it's not fair to subject myself to gaining an emotional attachment to her based on that. Besides, I know that they are still talking and she is still riding the fence. Should I really be that interested in her? I mean it's not like I'm in love or anything...it is just an old crush I've had since I was a teenager. Should I tell her to drop that zero and get with the hero? Should I keep accepting gifts and invitations to pajama parties? Should I risk him finding out about these parties and trying to connect with my skull like it was a Yankee reliever pitch to David Ortiz from the Red Sox? Okay, I almost cried again, let me catch myself...

Wow that was close.

And now friends, the moment you all have been waiting for. It's time for you to take me out of the situation and put yourself in. Guys what would you do? Ladies, what about you? Remember, the master of the dating world has already laid his chips on the table. The ball is in your court now. Have you been in a situation like this before? Talk about it.
You can post a comment by clicking on the comments button below this article and then scrolling down until you see "Post a comment" then post one anonymously. Or if you'd like put your name in with your comment. Let's keep them rolling in now. Talk to you soon.

FOOTBALL PICKS WEEK 6

Sorry guys, due to extended "coverage" of the ALCS, we didn't get the chance to do the week 6 picks. We could post them now, but you wouldn't believe us anyway. Score remains 9-8 Matthew over Khalid.

Wednesday, October 13, 2004

THE DATING GAME: You Can't Go Home Again... Or Can You?

In the world of sports today, it seems as if free agency, the draft and trades have had a serious affect on the restructuring of our teams, as we know them. For example, I am sure every Yankee fan on the face of the earth wanted to see Roger Clemens and Andy Petite back in the postseason…just not in Astros uniforms. The reality is this is a business. And when you are handling business, the owners, players, coaches, etc. have to be satisfied with what’s going on.

This leads me to this weeks dating scenario. I was wondering about my “old team” if you will, the other day. She is in her mid 20’s, college degree, soon to have a master’s degree. 5'6" 145 lbs. Brown-skinned, cute face, slammin’ body, which I will not get into, because we can give things like that stats.

If you’re anything like me fellas, then you are probably asking, “Why the hell did you let her go?” And if you’re anything like me again, I can say one word that will make you understand…attitude. I will let the collective OOOOOHHHHHHH’s die down before I continue.

Now... Her attitude sucked. There always seemed to be a problem. Sometimes it was another girl (you wouldn't believe me if I told you I was honest would you? Let's just say she don't' believe it either). Sometimes the issue was my friends and I going out. But it wasn't just sometime things, it was all the times. Typical relationship stuff I guess. It just seemed as if things were always brought to a level that was unnecessary. Now I’m sure you can relate to what I am saying whether you’re a man or a woman. We all have tendencies to take things to the extreme but that’s the way it goes sometimes. Anyway, I was thinking about “my old team” a lot over the past few weeks and told some of my, ahem, associates. Well, somebody leaked this to my old team like a bootlegged Jay-Z album on Fordham Road and the Grand Concourse. It bothered me a little, partially for what I explained in the beginning of the paragraph and since I have to keep finding new girls to date so I can bring you this article every week (tough job but someone has to do it, right?)

You see there’s something you have to keep in mind folks. A player (so to speak), a dedicated athlete doesn't’t leave a team so that they can go back. They sign with a new team and give the media the story of why they came here and how they want their “new team” to take the championship this year (in the dating game you would say the wedding rings…good analogy?) But regardless you can’t go backward. For instance, Shaquille O’Neal will never be a Laker again. It’s just not going to happen. It doesn't’t matter how much success they had in “the past.” Because what’s done is done. Roger Clemens will more than likely never pitch for the Yankees or the Red Sox again for that matter. That’s probably more related to the fact that he would get shot and hung outside Fenway Park as an ornament, but still it makes sense right? And with all of this on my mind, my old team decided it would be nice to drop me a line and say hello. And that’s when the phone rang. It took me a second to recognize the phone number, and then it rang clear as a church bell. It was my old “General Manager” giving me a call. I immediately thought about how my peeps sold me out. You never break bread with the enemy. If you're Steinbrenner you don't take back Clemens with open arms.

And at this point, I was getting a call from my old team…now an enemy. It rang once…then twice; if I’m gonna pick it up I gotta do it before the third ring.....

Now folks it’s on you. WHAT WOULD YOU DO? THINK ABOUT A PAST RELATIONSHIP YOU HAD AND ASK YOURSELF, IF YOU DECLARED FREE AGENCY, DEMANDED A TRADE OR YOUR “OWNER” EXERCISED THE CONTRACT TERMINATION CLAUSE IN YOUR PAPERWORK, WOULD YOU PICK UP THE PHONE? WOULD YOU BASE YOUR DECISION ON THE GOOD TIMES YOU HAD? OR THE BAD TIMES? WOULD YOU WANT TO JUST BE FRIENDS? OR REKINDLE THE MAGIC YOU HAD WITH YOUR "OLD TEAM"? REMEMBER I HAVE HANDLED THIS ALREADY…IT’S UP TO YOU TO USE YOUR MIND AND FIGURE OUT WHAT YOU WOULD DO…. LET’S KEEP THOSE COMMENTS ROLLING IN. SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.

WEEK 5 FOOTBALL RESULTS

The results are in from Week 5 of the NFL Season and here's a running tally of the teams and the winners. Based on their picks, Khalid and Matt both get one point at the end of the season, whover has the most points wins.

K = Khalid Washington
M = Matthew Lungariello

* - in case you couldn't figure it out.

Patriots vs. Dolphins = Patriots (K: 1 M: 1)
Vikings vs. Texans = Vikings (K: 2 M: 2)
Lions vs. Falcons = Lions (K: 2 M: 2)
Raiders vs. Colts = Colts (K:3 M: 3)
Giants vs. Cowboys = Giants (K: 4 M: 4)
Bucs vs. Saints = Bucs (K: 4 M: 4)
Browns vs. Steelers = Steelers (K: 5 M: 5)
Jags vs. Chargers = Chargers (K: 5 M: 5)
Bills vs. Jets = Jets (K: 6 M: 6)
Rams vs. Seahawks= Rams (K: 6 M: 6)
Cardinals vs 49ers = 49ers (K: 7 M: 7)
Carolina vs. Broncos = Broncos (K: 8 M: 8)
Ravens vs. Redskins = Ravens (K: 8 M: 9)
Titans vs. Packers = Titans (K: 8 M: 9)

OK, so it has begun. So far the score is neck to neck. Matthew leads Khalid by one point (9-8).

Friday, October 08, 2004

THE PRETENTIOUS SPORTS WEEK 5 FOOTBALL PICKS

note: Khalid Washington and Matthew Lungariello will start posting their football picks weekly. A score will be kept for each correct pick. At the end of the season, whoever has the most points will win a Blockbuster Gift Certificate courtesy of Allstate Insurance... remember "You're in Good Hands with Allstate..."

MATT'S PICKS
Miami @ Patriots: Patriots
Tampa Bay @ Saints: Saints
Raiders @ Colts: Colts
Browns @ Steelers: Steelers
Minnesota @ Texans: Minnesota
Bills @ Jets: Jets
Giants @ Cowboys: Giants
Rams @ Seattle: Seattle
Jaguars @ Chargers: Jaguars
Carolina @ Denver: Broncos
Lions @ Falcons: Falcons
Arizona @ 49ers: 49ers
Ravens @ Redskins: Ravins
Titans @ Packers: Packers

KHALID'S PICKS
Miami @ Patriots: Patriots
Tampa Bay @ Saints: Saints
Raiders @ Colts: Colts
Browns @ Steelers: Steelers
Minnesota @ Texans: Minnesota
Bills @ Jets: Jets
Giants @ Cowboys: Giants
Rams @ Seattle: Seattle
Jaguars @ Chargers: Jaguars
Carolina @ Denver: Broncos
Lions @ Falcons: Falcons
Arizona @ 49ers: 49ers
Ravens @ Redskins: Redskins
Titans @ Packers: Packers

Note from the editor: Wow you guys took some really risky picks! No, readers, you're not seeing double. They have the exact same picks except for the Ravens/Redskins matchup. Rebels! But that means one of them will take a one point lead in our PretentiousSports standings...

FLAG FOOTBALL WEEK 5: Khalid Takes Blame... For A Victory

written by Khalid Washington

We were phenomenal this week... well most of us.

If we would have lost, I would probably be the goat. But fortunately, we pulverized the other team into the "Mercy Rule." (*- That's when you are leading by a certain amount by the two-minute warning of the 4th quarter and they have no choice but to give up the game)

The only touchdown they scored was with me playing free safety, of course. It's my job to make sure nobody get's past me and it's my job to let the other safety know what's going on with my side of the field. This is in case he has to be ready to help me out. I did that for him... but did he do that for me? ...No. Of course not. You didn't think I'd take the full blame, do you?

Before the touchdown happened, I had a great defensive play on another deep route. I read the ball perfect, covered the spot, and should have had an interception but I knocked the ball down in an attempt to keep their offense on the longer side of the field. Pretty impressive if I do say so myself. But then again who else would say anything? Not coach Mike Marchena that's for sure.

But I digress, we already know how great I am, so let's get back on the touchdown that because of the other safety I let score. IT WAS THE OTHER GUY'S FAULT! I swear. And here's why: He had two receivers on his side running deep routes, one coming straight at him, and the other made a sharp left and started to head my way. I had two receivers running deep routes at me, so my focus was with them. My main weapon in playing defense is called "spying." This is where I read the quarterbacks eyes and wait to see which way he is looking so that I can cheat that way when he readies to release the ball. And just when I ran over that theory in my head, he looked at me... well, not directly at me. About 15 yards past me. At the receiver that I didn't know was sitting there by himself. I turned to sprint at him, but about four-five steps into my sprint, I was watching the ball land in the receiver's finger tips. I was too late.

Six points later my now famous coach/quarterback Mike Marchena said to me, "No more safety for you today." Great, thanks again, Mike. So I played cornerback for the rest of the day and celebrated the victory by being joked on as the only guy that got scored on that day. OK, so maybe it wasn't totally the other safety's fault. I'll be man enough to admit that again. After all I'm a flagger and I need to separate the men from the boys. I will take the blame for a victory...if that sounded right.

final score: 38-6 overall record: 4-1 see you next week.

Wednesday, October 06, 2004

PGA: Lay off the Juice!

written by Matthew Lungariello

Baseball’s all-time single season home run leader is being investigated for use of illegal steroids. Some time in 2005 or the beginning of the 2006 season, Barry Bonds will pass Hank Aaron for most career home runs and no one seems to care about it. Most people say that those records are tarnished because of all this BALCO talk. Yet Mark McGwire, was embraced by the entire country (I will address this racism issue within this country in another piece), held the single season home run crown, was admittedly taken Andro, which was available at any local GNC store. Don’t be fooled. It is now outlawed in Professional Baseball, and any way you slice it, it’s a performance enhancer. So the only slugger of that time that’s credibility has not taken a hit is Sammy Sosa. But wait! Sammy was caught using a corked bat. Whether or not he had always used that corked bat is a moot point, because after he was done serving his suspension he came back to hit home runs at a pace that was equivalent to any streak he had in his career. Not even the biggest of fools would return and immediately use a corked bat again.

Why is it that the fans and the media are so fast to attack baseball players for good performances? Professional Football players use steroids to help them run faster, gain weight, add muscle, and look better. Fans and casual observers don’t talk much about that because they want their football players bigger, stronger, and faster. I thought that baseball fans wanted the same things. I guess I am wrong. In baseball, they want to catch the players using enhancers. This country wants to put their players way up on a pedestal so that they can knock them down.

No one seems to talk about the fact that if a Professional Golfer changes his clubs or equipment, that he can add up to 50 yards on their drive. Does it sound like some of these guys are using a corked golf club? They are. Certain golf balls travel farther than others. But no one cares, they are too busy worrying about whether today’s baseballs are wound tighter than they were in the past. What about the golf balls? They are wound tighter too. Golf is the only sport where a man like Daly who has battled drug and Alcohol addictions, and still has an entire group of people on his side, cheering for him. In any other sport, this guy would be an outcast. They cheer for him because he can drive the ball 400 yards. The fans don’t care that he is on steroids, uses corked clubs, tightly wounded balls, or that he was just drunk and using beer muscles. If this man played any other sport, the fans would have chewed him up and spit him out because of all his trips to rehab. (see Darryl Strawberry (see race issue above)). They didn’t care how far Strawberry could hit the ball, because they considered him an addict.

Golf’s version of steroids is simply in their equipment. Some Golfers use certain equipment, and have advantages over other players before the competition even starts. Tiger Woods changed his equipment and blamed his miserable play on his clubs. He claimed that he needed to use different clubs. Everyone can test this theory. Go to your local driving range and use one of the drivers that they have in the bucket that looks like it should have a keg in it, and hit some cheap balls toward the 200 yard sign. Not that easy. Once you smell the burning from the clubs smacking into the ground too often, take a break and look around. See who looks like they have the nicest equipment. Go up to them (you cant ask them to borrow their driver, because they will say no), and steal the club from their hands and run. Once you get back to your little area put the ball down, set yourself, and swing as quickly as possible. Chances are this guy is going to be running after you with a 4 iron in his hand. My guess is that you will see that golf ball soar past that 200 yard sign with ease, or if you don’t, it will be a hell of a lot closer to the sign than with the other clubs. After that, that angry fellow should be arriving near you to beat you up. Hold out his club, and tell him that you like it. I will leave the on-the-spot excuse to you. But you have now used what we’ll call a “corked” golf club. Let’s just call you Sammy Sosa.

There is equipment and substances in every sport that can be considered “illegal.” I say leave them alone. Leave them alone until someone does something about the sport where old out of shape drunks can still be competitive because they are juicing.

Thank you for all the support. And juice one for me!

PRETENTIOUS SPORTS SETS THE TREND FOR ESPN

http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/news/story?id=1894834

ESPN has published an editorial about Tiger Woods needing to get married to improve his game. Though Matthew Lungariello took a different stance on this very blog a few days ago, Matthew beat them to the punch on the topic. Another example of ESPN imitating PretentiousSports! See for yourself, and of course, you can go to the original "Women Weaken Legs" in our archives.

Tuesday, October 05, 2004

JOBU NEEDS A REFILL: 10/5/2004

the week in sports from the weak in sports

written by Buddy Lung
MNF: KANSAS CITY BEATS BALTIMORE 27-24 - Kansas City coach Dick Vermeil said to the press after the win, "This was a tough loss, we just need to get our offense going and... What? What's that? We won tonight!? We actually won a game!? A whole game? Woohoo!"

FRIGGIN' DALE - Dale Earnhardt, Jr. lost the top spot in points in the NASCAR Nextel Cup. Why? He got docked 25 points as a penalty. How? For "cussing" during a television interview after his last race! When hearing of the 25 point penalty, Jr's response was "oh shit!"

NOW THAT WASN'T SO BAD WAS IT? - Gary Payton, who said he refused to play for the Boston Celtics after his trade from the LA Lakers this summer, actually showed up to training camp, much to the surprise of many. Payton, recently arrested for DUI, said the change of heart came because he needed some money to pay off what he called "traffic violation tickets."

Oh yeah! and if you haven't noticed, the Major League Baseball season just ended...

THE CURSE OF THE SAMMINO - Sammy Sosa publicly voiced his frustrations because he feels he's been blamed by Dusty Baker and the Cubs faithful for not making the playoffs this year or the World Series last year. Now he knows how that poor goat feels.

ICHIRO IS AMAZING - He set a new single season hits record. Sure, he might hit better than me, but I bet he can't touch the tip of his nose with his tongue like I can.

PHILLIES, METS, MARINERS FIRE THEIR MANAGERS - Need a new manager, guys? What about George Forman? Look at what he did for the cooking grill, just imagine your team.

RED SOX VS. ANGELS SERIES - This is the one time that you could say "It'll be 1986 all over again" and Boston fans think that is a good thing.

DODGERS VS. CARDINALS SERIES - If I were the Dodgers, I'd have Eric Cagne come in the 3rd inning every game.

TWINS VS. YANKEES SERIES - My prediction is either the Yankees lose and everyone says the Yankees have no starting pitching and A-Rod choked. Or the Yankees win and everyone says they are unfair because of the payroll.

ASTROS VS. BRAVES SERIES - Two seasoned postseason losers go head-to-head. Think of it this way, they can't both lose... or can they?

DATING GAME PART 2: Khalid Washington Still Thinks Girls are a Sport

written by Khalid Washington

NOTE TO SELF: Call the Olympic Board and see if Dating could be made an official event...

Hello all, it’s time for my 2nd installment of the Pretentious Sports Dating Game. This week's scenario involves two women friends of mine that I have known and hung out with for a few months. I feel like Jack Tripper when I hang out with them. No, not because I’m goofy, stumbling over the couch, and wearing a 1970’s tight leisure suit. But, it's just that when you are a guy hanging out with two women friends like that, there is automatically a Three's Company vibe in the air. All I need is Don Knotts a.k.a. Mr. Furley to walk in to complete the fantasy… not that I fantasize about Don Knotts or anything.

Now, let’s discuss the girls. We will call the first one Bachelorette #1 for now.

SCOUTING REPORT FOR BACHELORETTE #1:
-Smart and educated (well she’s got a Bachelor’s degree anyway)
-Exceptionally attractive (I think she batted a career .412 smokin’ average)
-And she’s witty.

Biggest turn off about #1 is the boyfriend she has… BUT since he lives about 6 states away, not a problem for a pro Dating Gamer like myself. And when I am hanging out with them, #1 has never mentioned him, and I mean never. I heard about him when I first met her. He’s history as far as I’m concerned. Aside from that, #1 has a good sense of humor and that is better than not, that’s for sure. Someone once told me “the way to a woman’s heart is through laughter” and that goes for men to. (Of course, when I was first told that, I would laugh at all girls I met, point at them and laugh and no girls ever went for it. I then realized, the person who gave me the advice meant laughter from them, not laughter at them).

SCOUTING REPORT FOR BACHELORETTE #2:
-Also smart and educated (#1 and #2 graduated college together)
-More reserved than #1, whom is much more outgoing and talkative (some would call it flirtatious).
The one real difference, though, is (sorry I’m a man) #2’s probably not the most attractive girl in my opinion. #2 has a great personality and is also reasonably funny (if not as funny as #1), but let’s face it, #2 is more Mr. Furley than Chrissy as far as the looks go. But, hey, I don’t mean that as harsh to #2, because as you know I often fantasize about Mr. Furley as it is.

So, now that you know who they are, here's what happened:

I went out with both the girls the other night. Flashback in your minds, if you will friends, to the opening credits to Three's Company. There was Jack, Chrissie and Janet. They were walking along in the zoo, the three of them arm in arm talking and joking. It was something like that, I don’t even think Chrissy was still in the show on the zoo episodes, but this is my article, not their’s, so I make up the facts as I see fit (editor’s note: this last sentence edited for factual content)

Bachelorette #2 was being calm and reserved and Bachelorette #1 was being flirtacious and playfully sarcastic. From time to time, I would give #2 a look and she pouts slightly as if she feels she is being left out. I think #2 likes me, and she is cool, but I'm definitely more attracted to #1.

While I was driving them home, Bachelorette #1 (mind you, who sits in the front seat most of the time), asked me, "So how come you never mentioned a girlfriend?"

"I don't have one," I said.

She went on. "No love interest or people that you are seeing?"

“I have friends and that's it,” I said.

Then came the question that gets my attention… "Do you feel lonely, like you want to be with someone?" she asked. And I responded...

This is where you guys fill in the blank. Is she making a play for me? Or is she asking these questions for her shy and reserved friend? Is there a chance for a double play here? (This is a sports article… work with me people!!)

PLEASE KEEP ONE THING IN MIND WHEN POSTING YOUR COMMENTS: THIS IS NOT AN ADVICE COLUMN FOR MY BENEFIT. I DON’T NEED TO KNOW WHAT TO DO, BECAUSE I’VE ALREADY DONE IT. WHAT I AM DISCUSSING HERE IS FROM THE PAST AND HAS ALREADY BEEN TAKEN CARE OF. THIS IS STRICTLY FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES

SO ASK YOURSELVES...WHAT WOULD I DO IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS? RESPONSES ARE VERY IMPORTANT SO PLEASE RESPOND. IF I DON'T GET ENOUGH COMMENTS THIS WEEK, PRETENTIOUS SPORTS IS PULLING THIS COLUMN. I THINK THEY'RE JUST MAD THAT THEY DONT' DATE AS MANY WOMEN AS ME. OR MAYBE IT'S BECAUSE THE MAN BEHIND MY EDITOR IS ACTUALLY DON KNOTTS (hey, I’m not the one fantasizing about the guy -ed.) ANYWAY, ENJOY AND LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU WOULD DO...

PLAYOFFS: Anaheim vs Boston

written by Matthew Lungariello

Out of the eight playoffs teams, there are five with legitimate shots at winning the World Series. Three of them are in the American League, and two are in this series.

The key for the Red Sox is to score early and often, because if there is any weak part of the Angels, it is their starting pitching. If the Angels hand it over to their bullpen, they have been lights out. Schilling has to be lights out. If the Angels get the best of Schilling, I don’t think this series will see 5 games.

The key for the Angels is to keep is close and try to get it into the Red Sox shaky bullpen. Keith Foulke has been less than impressive down the stretch with 7 blown saves this year. We don’t know how he will react in this big spot. Vlad has been nothing short of the leagues MVP. They need to work the count and stretch Schilling out. Prevent him from going all 9 innings.

This has the makings of the best series in Baseball. Honestly, it can go either way. I like the Angels to win, simply because I would never bet against the hottest team. If the series goes to game 5, I like Schilling to out duel Washburn in California. The will be a hostile crowd in both parks, but he has the ability to rise above it.

Angels in... I don’t know how many games. But it'll be the Angels all right.

PLAYOFFS: L.A. vs St. Louis

written by John Raimondo, Jr.

With the 2004 Division Series underway today at 1:00p.m., it seams pretty certain, on paper at least, who will be victorious in the L.A. Dodger-St. Louis Cardinal series.

The Cardinals, who to many surprised the league this year, had a MLB-leading record. If one were to look at both teams and compare them on paper, there truly is a stronger, better team in the Cardinals. Each position gives the Cardianls the advantage.

With the exception of second base, Alex Cora being a very tough out throughout the year and a great fielder. And third base. Not to overlook Scott Rolen, who is one of the best right now, but Adrian Beltre has had an MVP calibre season, leading his team to many come from behind
victories and led the league in Homeruns. The Cardinals take the cake.

The Cardinals offense is quite possibly the best in the league and I wouldn't mind seeing them go all the way to the World Series (St.Louis is supposedly the best baseball town in america, so why not?). But as has been proven year in and year out, the teams with the better pitching staff have walked away with World Series titles; hence why the Yankees have lost two of the past three series, although they were the favorites last year. The Cardinals pitching staff is well equipped this year with all 5 starters winning 11 games or more and a good bullpen, one of which features Jason Isringhausen (EX-MET, way to go Wilpon!) who was tied this year with 48 saves to lead the national league.

But do not count out the Dodgers staff, although they are nowhere near as good as the Cardinals staff was during the regualar season (A down and out "finished" Jose Lima leads the team with a 13-5 record), and most of the starters except for Lima all have losing records. But they have shown heart and guts all year, coming from behind not only to win games, but their division. If their pitching can hold down that "Murderous Row" of an offense, Gagne is still in the top three for relievers in the he game and he will shut them down.

Cardinals win this series in 4, just to be generous to L.A. And if you love baseball like I do, you have to love the Cardinals offense and hope to see it matched up against the Yanks.......OR the Red Sox?

PLAYOFFS: New York vs. Minnesota

written by Buddy Lung

There's no getting around that Johan Santana is the best picture in the American League right now, and new york is about to face him TWICE. That's not even taking into account Radke who hasn't exactly been the pits this year. The Twins are also one of the flashiest defensive teams in the leagues and are almost unbeatable at the MetroDome.

Now having said that, let's also realize that New York is very much in control of this series. It's a bet that the Yankees can't lose to Minnesota, that they can only beat themselves. The key is not going to be pitching as is so much advertised (especially noting the Yankees alleged atrocious starting rotation). Let's face it, pound for pound, the Yankees have a BETTER starting rotation than Minnesota. True, maybe some of them haven't exactly had career years, but I'll take Kevin Brown, Mike Mussina, El Duque, Javier Vasquez, and heck pre surgery 20-game winner (Cubs 2001) Jon Lieber over just Johan Santana. You'd be foolish to say the starting staff, inconsistent as it could be, is not by any means BAD. You could have Mussina throwing beach balls... or you could get the real Mike Mussina, the Mussina who is one of the best pitchers of the last twenty years. And even if Mussina isn't going to do it, someone is... Let's face it, Minnesota doesn't have what it takes to eat up the entire Yanks' pitching staff. The truth is we will probably see relatively low scoring games.

Which is where the real key comes into play: SELECTIVITY in the Yankees lineup. Even against Santana, the Yankees are basically your bullpen's worst nightmare. The Yankees can find a way to win. The game could go 8 hitless innings, and one change of pitcher in the 9th inning and you're talking a 4-run rally to win the game. The key is going to be selective offense. The quicker the Yankees get Santana out of the game, the quicker the Yankees can make jumps after the opposing pitching.

We know about the pitching, what it comes down to is the offense. With seasoned postseason vets like Jeter, Bernie, Rivera, Lofton, Sheffield, ARod and let's not forget the secret offensive weapon of Hideki Matsui, the offense has been waiting for October all year. And despite Minnesota's havign Santana and a pretty much flawless closer in Nathan, this Yanks lineup need fear no one and New York's already shown Nathan isn't so unhittable as far as the Yankees are concerned.

What it comes down to is, with Santana or not, all the Yankees need is mid level pitching performances from their staff to keep the games reachable. After that, it comes down to how on the Yankees offense will be. And if Minnesota is going to have to go toe-to-toe with the Yankees offense, they better bring their golf clubs, because it'd be a short series for Minnesota. You'll see as much the first game coming up, Minnesota is in a must-win situation when Santana is in the mound. And even their MetroDome advantage hasn't applied against the Yanks in other postseason play. The Yankees are in control of this one.

YANKS IN 5.

PLAYOFFS: Atlanta vs Houston

written by Khalid Washington

Dead even is how I see this series...well almost. it's playoff time in the MLB and we at Pretentious Sports have you covered like white on rice. Lets talk about the upcoming playoff series between the NL East Champion Atlanta Braves and the NL Wild Card Houston Astros. 1st let's look at the way everything breaks down:

1. During their regular season series there was a 3 to 3 split through 6 games (each game was decided by and average of 1.5 runs)
2. Atlanta has shut down pitchers with Jared Wright and Russ Ortiz
3. Houston has shut down pitching with Roger Clemens and Roy Oswalt
4. Atlanta has great hitters in J.D. Drew and the Jones Boys
5. Houston has Jeff Kent and the Killer B’s (Biggio, Bagwell, Berkman, Beltran)

So, when it's all said and done, who’s the winner in this series? Who cares?

Whether it is the Braves or the Astros that advance during this best of five, does anybody think they will have what it takes to get past the NLCS? Not if they face the St. Louis Cardinals. And I think everybody knows that the winner of this series will face St. Louis. But since I have to pick one of these teams to win this playoff series, I will have to go with (drum roll please) the Houston Astros. It is noted that Atlanta has home field advantage, and Bobby Cox at the helm, which recently moved into the 9th position all time for most wins as a manager. Their best bet in this series is to make key outs, turn double plays and pray that J.D. and the Jones boys can produce for at least 3 or 4 runs and the lead.

If they can survive to the 9th inning with a lead in any of these games, John Smoltz should be able to shut the door. But Houston’s line up stocked full of big bats might not be as easy to contain for the Braves as we think. The experience factor seems to lean towards Houston as well. Roger Clemens knows better than any player on the field the meaning of pressure packed situation. This should be a walk in the park for him. Bagwell and Biggio have been with Houston in situations like these before, and Jeff Kent is only two years removed from the World Series with his good buddy Barry Bonds (that’s funny) and the San Francisco Giants. But of course as is everything else, this is just prediction. We will have to wait until Wednesday to find out who will advance in this series…. only to get pulverized by the St. Louis Cardinals.